Loading…
This event has ended. View the official site or create your own event → Check it out
This event has ended. Create your own
View analytic
Monday, July 23 • 12:00pm - 1:00pm
LHRB-SIS Program: "Digging" Legal History in Boston: The Case of the Boston Strangler

Sign up or log in to save this to your schedule and see who's attending!

Target Audience: Librarians and researchers interested in learning the uses of modern forensic science techniques and exhumation to prove legal historical facts; librarians and researchers who wish to learn about the forensic developments in the Boston Strangler case that changed the face of this crime

Learning outcomes:

1) Participants will be able to assess the role of modern forensic science techniques and exhumation in re-examinations of historical legal events.

2) Participants will be able to explain how forensic techniques unavailable during the 1960s produced evidence 36 years later indicating that the publicly accepted identity of the Boston Strangler may be a mistake.

The person lodged in the public consciousness as the Boston Strangler never stood trial for the murders of 11 women in the Boston area from 1962 to 1964. Although defense attorney F. Lee Bailey obtained the confession of Albert DeSalvo, no physical evidence linked DeSalvo to the killings, and his versions of the killings did not harmonize fully with the facts. James E. Starrs, Professor Emeritus of Law and Forensic Sciences at George Washington University Law School, led the team that performed the exhumation and re-autopsy of Mary Sullivan, the Strangler's purported last victim, and DeSalvo, both at the request of the families. Starrs returns to AALL to discuss the forensic evidence obtained during re-examination, and how this evidence destroyed the credibility of DeSalvo's claim to be the Boston Strangler.


Organizers/Presenters

Monday July 23, 2012 12:00pm - 1:00pm
HCC-Room 206

Attendees (88)